|
Anesthetic preconditioning and perioperative myocardial protectionReviewers: David Deyhimy, MD, Hong Liu, MD
Myocardial ischemia during the perioperative period is a serious risk factor for patients undergoing both cardiac and noncardiac surgeries. Up to 74% of patients with coronary artery disease experience perioperative myocardial ischemia during noncardiac surgery.1 Prevention of ischemia has traditionally focused on maintaining the balance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand using β-adrenergic antagonists, α-agonists, and/or calcium channel blockers. New evidence suggests that volatile anesthetics at clinical concentrations (1 MAC) may also be useful in pre-venting perioperative myocardial ischemia. Ever since Murry first reported that multiple brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion reduced subsequent myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury2 (termed ischemic preconditioning), researchers have endeavored to understand the underlying mechanisms responsible. Current research is focused on determining how interactions at the cellular, sub-cellular, and molecular levels impart protection against myocardial ischemia and infarction. Several key intracellular signaling pathways resulting in the opening of sarcolemmal and mitochondrial K-ATP channels have now been identified.4 These K-ATP channels are thought to be one of the primary end effectors of preconditioning ultimately enabling the cell to withstand I/R injury. After sub-lethal ischemia, two distinct periods of protection have been identified. The first protective period occurs immediately and lasts about two hours. This is followed by a second period of protection appearing after 24 hours and lasting up to 72 hours.3 These are commonly referred to as the early and delayed "windows" of preconditioning. Investigators have also discovered that the administration of volatile anesthetics produces a preconditioned state with features similar to that seen with ischemic preconditioning (IPC). As with IPC, anesthetic preconditioning (APC) mediates protective effects via intracellular messaging pathways ultimately resulting in the opening of sarcolemmal and mitochondrial K-ATP channels.5 In 1997, Kersten reported that isoflurane imparted protection against I/R injury in dog myocardium.5 Subsequent studies have shown that all currently used inhalational anesthetic agents are capable of producing myocardial protection against I/R injury with an efficacy comparable to IPC.6 Currently, a great deal of effort is aimed at trying to determine how ischemic and anesthetic preconditioning can be used to benefit patients in clinical settings. Ottani (1995) reported that the presence of pre-infarction angina was associated with a decreased infarction size and better post-operative ventricular function. Similarly, Kloner reported that pre-infarction angina decreased the 30-day post-operative cardiac event rate.7,8 It has also been reported that patients undergoing balloon angioplasty who had short repeated periods of ischemia (inflation and deflation of the angioplasty balloon prior to definitive prolonged balloon inflation) had fewer symptoms, less ST elevation, less frequent in-hospital cardiac events, and a decreased one-year mortality compared with patients who did not receive the ischemic preconditioning prior to balloon angioplasty.9,10 Intermittent occlusion of coronary artery during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has also been shown to be beneficial. These protective effects are not seen in diabetic patients for reasons not clearly understood. In addition, certain drugs such as glybenclamide, a selective ATP-sensitive K+ channel blocker, have been shown to prevent preconditioning. Despite the protective effects of IPC, routine use has not becomew idely accepted. Conversely, the use of volatile anesthetics prior to ischemia is easy to apply and is gaining greater acceptance for this application. Although earlier studies were controversial, recent studies consistantly demonstrate that volatile anesthetics decreased release of CK-MB, troponin, TNF-a, and BNP. In addition, there is evidence that APC results in better preservation of cardiac function following ischemia, and often less inotropic support is required.12 In summary, laboratory studies have demonstrated that exposing the myocardium to a volatile anesthetic before a period of ischemia provides significant protection against subsequent I/R injury. Despite encouraging results in the small numbers of published clinical studies, more clinical data are needed to further our understanding. A large, multi-center clinical study is warranted to determine whether the cardioprotective effects seen with APC translate into decreased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac and noncardiac surgery. References:
Table of Contents:
© Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Questions or comments? Please send email to webmaster@scahq.org |