CON: Monitoring heart rate variability adds a significant incremental value in cardiovascular surgery

Jay Horrow, MD & Dmitri Chamchad, MD
Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

Monitoring of traditional vital signs - systemic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature - provide value only insofar as they predict short- or long-term outcomes. We miss potentially valuable predictive information when limiting monitors to those four. The added value of SpO2, EEG, cardiac output, and SSEPs demonstrates this limitation. Likewise, delving beneath the surface of raw physiologic data extracts better predictors. Witness the advantage of spectral analysis of the EEG, and of ST segment analysis of ECG signals.

We thus can understand the attempt to predict outcome from how heart rate varies from beat to beat. A large volume of studies have attempted to associate heart rate variability (HRV) with diverse outcomes, including sudden cardiac death 1-5, cardiac arrhythmias 6-13, myocardial infarction 14-16 , diabetes 17,18, heart failure 19-24, COPD 25 and sleep abnormalities 26-30. Just how successfully do analyses of heart rate variability predict outcomes? The answer depends on the type of analysis and on data acquisition techniques.

Differences in signal sampling rate and in durations of recording plague attempts to compare analytic techniques across studies. In the absence of standardized signal acquisition criteria, comparisons of analytic techniques are limited to reports applying several analyses to the same data, acquired appropriately for all applied analyses.

Simple analyses of the raw ECG signal collect statistics on the R-R intervals and are termed time domain measurements. They perform relatively poorly as predictors of clinical outcomes 31. Malliani et al. 32 reviewed different human pathophysiologic conditions, demonstrating the superior predictive ability of spectral analysis, i.e., frequency domain analyses, compared to time domain summary statistics. Lombardi 33 tried to identify patients with increased cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction using time domain measures. Sensitivity and specificity were poor; positive predictive value was < 30 percent. The time domain measures results depended on the point in the recording period, leading Lombardi to speculate whether non-linear analyses could describe better this complex behavior. Other investigators also found time domain analyses inferior to more sophisticated ones. 9,10,34-37. In a few cases, discrepancies in data acquisition techniques might explain the differences.

A more sophisticated analysis transforms the time domain data to the frequency domain, in the following way. Any repetitive signal can be expressed as a series of sine waves of various frequencies, with the amplitude of each wave reflective of its relative contribution. We display the amplitude squared (power) in a power spectrum analysis. Theoretical considerations lead one to assume that the higher frequency portion has a major vagal contribution and the lower frequency component influences both sympathetic and vagal autonomic traffic 32,38-43. Such theoretical associations cannot substitute for robust outcome data. Indeed, those associations face stiff challenges 44-46. The limitation may arise from the fact that the Fourier transformation converting data from the time domain to the frequency domain assumes "stationarity" of the system generating the signal. Heart rate and other similar biological phenomena display non-stationarity. 31

Indeed, outcome studies using frequency domain analyses show only modest predictive value for a variety of outcome measures, or results that cannot be validated upon repeat study 31. Although Frost et al. 47 reported differences in power spectrum analysis measurements in patients who developed atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization, Halaka et al. 9 could not reproduce that finding, finding similar results (p>0.10 for atrial fibrillation v. others) for time domain and power spectrum analyses. Chamchad et al. 48 likewise found no significant predictive utility of power spectra, although significance levels were between 0.05 and 0.08. Hogue et al. 10 concluded that frequency domain measures did not predict reliably the occurrence of ventricular dysrhythmias, whereas more sophisticated, nonlinear analytic measures did.

Laitio et al. studied predictors of >48 hour stay in the intensive care unit following coronary revascularization. Multivariate logistic regression identified only 2 independent predictors: APACHE II score and a nonlinear HRV measure called detrended fluctuation analysis parameter alpha-1, with alpha-1 being the more significant factor at p=0.039 (odds ratio 0.103 per 0.2 units). Time and frequency domain HRV parameters did not predict prolonged stay 49. Even in studies where frequency domain results correlated well with outcome, they proved inferior to results using more sophisticated, non-linear measures. For example, using 24 hour recordings, the nonlinear measure "approximate entropy" predicted the onset of atrial fibrillation better than more traditional HRV methods 50. What are these newer methods?

Spawned from chaos theory and fractals, non-linear measures identify high level components of information. The names of the calculated parameters reflect their abstract properties, quite divorced from readily identifiable physiologic phenomena: approximate entropy, for example, measures the degree of unpredictability in a set of data 10,36,50-54. Poincaré plot analysis uses hundreds or thousands of ordered pairs consisting of an RR interval and the RR interval of an immediately adjoining beat. The shape of the ensuing data cloud provides inferences on the stationarity of the system, with promising results 55-59. Point correlation dimension (PD2) measures the number of independent generators of information within a given system 34,60-64. In a pilot study of 22 parturients receiving spinal anesthesia for Cesaerean section, the 11 patients who developed hypotension after spinal anesthesia had the 11 lowest PD2 values (100% sensitivity and specificity); the 2 patients with bradycardia were among those same 11 64. Low and high frequency components (frequency domain measures) and their ratio did not predict hypotension. Likewise, in a multivariate logistic regression seeking associations of many HRV parameters with atrial fibrillation following coronary revascularization, PD2 (odds ratio 3.03, p=0.025) along with age and body weight, but not time domain or frequency domain measures, associated well (overall c-statistic 0.88) 48.

Current evidence suggests that these nonlinear metrics fare better than time and frequency domain analyses. However, it is too early to promote these metrics as predictors of clinical outcome. We need further work. First, we need acquisition techniques with efficient algorithms that permit real-time calculation. We also need validation of preliminary work in prospective cohorts. Most convincing of all will be demonstration of a clinical outcome advantage of substantial proportions following prospective calculation of a HRV parameter leading to intervention. Will HRV analysis ever display the same clinical impact achieved in the classic paradigm of hypotension and tachycardia --> fluid administration --> resolution of hypotension and tachycardia? Stay tuned.

[The authors acknowledge helpful advice and explanations from Dr J.E. Skinner.]


  1. Berger RD, Kasper EK, Baughman KL et al. Beat-to-Beat QT Interval Variability: Novel Evidence for Repolarization Lability in Ischemic and Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 1997; 96:1557-65.
  2. Huikuri HV, Tapanainen JM, Lindgren K et al. Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:652-8.
  3. Hull SS, Jr., Vanoli E, Adamson PB et al. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1994; 89:548-52.
  4. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M et al. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death. New insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation 1988; 78:969-79.
  5. Tsuji H, Larson MG, Venditti FJ et al. Impact of Reduced Heart Rate Variability on Risk for Cardiac Events: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1996; 94:2850-5.
  6. Ascione R, Reeves BC, Santo K et al. Predictors of new malignant ventricular arrhythmias after coronary surgery: a case-control study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:1630-8.
  7. Akyurek O, Diker E, Guldal M, Oral D. Predictive value of heart rate variability for the recurrence of chronic atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion. Clin Cardiol 2003; 26:196-200.
  8. Dimmer C, Tavernier R, Gjorgov N et al. Variations of autonomic tone preceding onset of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:22-5.
  9. Hakala T, Vanninen E, Hedman A, Hippelainen M. Analysis of heart rate variability does not identify the patients at risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand Cardiovasc J 2002; 36:167-71.
  10. Hogue CW, Jr., Domitrovich PP, Stein PK et al. RR Interval Dynamics Before Atrial Fibrillation in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Circulation 1998; 98:429-34.
  11. Lombardi F, Tarricone D, Tundo F et al. Autonomic nervous system and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a study based on the analysis of RR interval changes before, during and after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2004; 25:1242-8.
  12. Malik M, Camm AJ. Heart rate variability. Clin Cardiol 1990; 13:570-6.
  13. Pruvot E, Thonet G, Vesin J-M et al. Heart Rate Dynamics at the Onset of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias as Retrieved From Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 2000; 101:2398-404.
  14. Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC. The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993; 88:927-34.
  15. Bigger JT, Jr., Fleiss JL, Steinman RC et al. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992; 85:164-71.
  16. Carney RM, Blumenthal JA, Stein PK et al. Depression, Heart Rate Variability, and Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2001; 104:2024-8.
  17. Moran A, Palmas W, Field L et al. Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy Is Associated With Microalbuminuria in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27:972-7.
  18. Schroeder EB, Chambless LE, Liao D et al. Diabetes, Glucose, Insulin, and Heart Rate Variability: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:668-74.
  19. Bilchick KC, Fetics B, Djoukeng R et al. Prognostic value of heart rate variability in chronic congestive heart failure (Veterans Affairs' Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure). Am J Cardiol 2002; 90:24-8.
  20. Atherton JJ, Thomson HL, Moore TD et al. Diastolic Ventricular Interaction: A Possible Mechanism for Abnormal Vascular Responses During Volume Unloading in Heart Failure. Circulation 1997; 96:4273-9.
  21. Bernardi L, Porta C, Spicuzza L et al. Slow Breathing Increases Arterial Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation 2002; 105:143-5.
  22. Cooley RL, Montano N, Cogliati C et al. Evidence for a Central Origin of the Low-Frequency Oscillation in RR-Interval Variability. Circulation 1998; 98:556-61.
  23. Galinier M, Pathak A, Fourcade J et al. Depressed low frequency power of heart rate variability as an independent predictor of sudden death in chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2000; 21:475-82.
  24. Nolan J, Batin PD, Andrews R et al. Prospective Study of Heart Rate Variability and Mortality in Chronic Heart Failure: Results of the United Kingdom Heart Failure Evaluation and Assessment of Risk Trial (UK-Heart). Circulation 1998; 98:1510-6.
  25. Gold DR, Litonjua A, Schwartz J et al. Ambient Pollution and Heart Rate Variability. Circulation 2000; 101:1267-73.
  26. Crasset V, Mezzetti S, Antoine M et al. Effects of Aging and Cardiac Denervation on Heart Rate Variability During Sleep. Circulation 2001; 103:84-8.
  27. Kuo TBJ, Yang CCH. Sleep-Related Changes in Cardiovascular Neural Regulation in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Circulation 2005; 112:849-54.
  28. Hilton MF, Chappell MJ, Bartlett WA et al. The sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome depresses waking vagal tone independent of sympathetic activation. Eur Respir J 2001; 17:1258-66.
  29. Narkiewicz K, Montano N, Cogliati C et al. Altered Cardiovascular Variability in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Circulation 1998; 98:1071-7.
  30. Mietus J, Peng C, Ivanov P, Goldberger A. Detection of obstructive sleep apnea from cardiac interbeat interval time series. Computers in Cardiology 2000; 27:753-6.
  31. Electrophysiology TFotESoCtNASoP. Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use. Circulation 1996; 93:1043-65.
  32. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation 1991; 84:482-92.
  33. Lombardi F. Chaos Theory, Heart Rate Variability, and Arrhythmic Mortality. Circulation 2000; 101:8-10.
  34. Skinner JE, Pratt CM, Vybiral T. A reduction in the correlation dimension of heartbeat intervals precedes imminent ventricular fibrillation in human subjects. Am Heart J 1993; 125:731-43.
  35. Huikuri HV, Seppanen T, Koistinen MJ et al. Abnormalities in beat-to-beat dynamics of heart rate before the spontaneous onset of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93:1836-44.
  36. Pincus SM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88:2297-301.
  37. Ryan SM, Goldberger AL, Pincus SM et al. Gender- and age-related differences in heart rate dynamics: are women more complex than men? J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24:1700-7.
  38. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Madwed JB et al. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1985; 249:H867-75.
  39. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel F et al. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat to beat cardiovascular control. Science 1981;213:220-2.
  40. Bernardi L, Bianchini B, Spadacini G et al. Demonstrable Cardiac Reinnervation After Human Heart Transplantation by Carotid Baroreflex Modulation of RR Interval. Circulation 1995; 92:2895-903.
  41. Goldberger AL, West BJ. Applications of nonlinear dynamics to clinical cardiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci,/I> 1987; 504:195-213.
  42. Montano N, Ruscone TG, Porta A et al. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation 1994; 90:1826-31.
  43. Pagani M, Montano N, Porta A et al. Relationship Between Spectral Components of Cardiovascular Variabilities and Direct Measures of Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Humans. Circulation 1997; 95:1441-8.
  44. Parati G, Saul JP, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Spectral Analysis of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability in Evaluating Cardiovascular Regulation: A Critical Appraisal. Hypertension 1995; 25:1276-86.
  45. Eckberg DL. Sympathovagal Balance: A Critical Appraisal. Circulation 1997; 96:3224-32.
  46. Berntson GG, Bigger JT, Jr., Eckberg DL et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:623-48.
  47. Frost L, Molgaard H, Christiansen EH et al. Atrial fibrillation and flutter after coronary artery bypass surgery: epidemiology, risk factors and preventive trials. Int J Cardiol 1992; 36:253-61.
  48. Chamchad D, Jung H, Djaiani G et al. Heart Rate Variability: Predictor of Cardiac Arrhythmia after CABG Surgery Anesthesiology 2004; 101:A-241.
  49. Laitio TT, Huikuri HV, Kentala ES et al. Correlation properties and complexity of perioperative RR-interval dynamics in coronary artery bypass surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:69-80.
  50. Vikman S, Makikallio TH, Yli-Mayry S et al. Altered Complexity and Correlation Properties of R-R Interval Dynamics Before the Spontaneous Onset of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 1999; 100:2079-84.
  51. Pincus SM, Goldberger AL. Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? Am J Physiol 1994; 266:H1643-56.
  52. Richman JS, Moorman JR. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 278:H2039-49.
  53. Costa M, Goldberger AL, Peng CK. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 89:068102.
  54. Pikkujamsa SM, Makikallio TH, Sourander LB et al. Cardiac Interbeat Interval Dynamics From Childhood to Senescence: Comparison of Conventional and New Measures Based on Fractals and Chaos Theory. Circulation 1999; 100:393-9.
  55. Brennan M, Palaniswami M, Kamen P. Do existing measures of Poincare plot geometry reflect nonlinear features of heart rate variability? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001; 48:1342-7.
  56. Lerma C, Infante O, Perez-Grovas H, Jose MV. Poincare plot indexes of heart rate variability capture dynamic adaptations after haemodialysis in chronic renal failure patients. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2003; 23:72-80.
  57. Tulppo MP, Makikallio TH, Takala TE et al. Quantitative beat-to-beat analysis of heart rate dynamics during exercise. Am J Physiol 1996; 271:H244-52.
  58. Penttila J, Helminen A, Jartti T et al. Time domain, geometrical and frequency domain analysis of cardiac vagal outflow: effects of various respiratory patterns. Clin Physiol 2001; 21:365-76.
  59. Krstacic G, Martinis M, Vergivic E et al. Non-linear dynamics in patients with stable angina Pectoris. Computers in Cardiology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2001.
  60. Kresh JY, Izrailtyan I. Evolution in functional complexity of heart rate dynamics: a measure of cardiac allograft adaptability. Am J Physiol 1998; 275:R720-7.
  61. Skinner JE, Molnar M, Tomberg C. The point correlation dimension: performance with nonstationary surrogate data and noise. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 1994; 29:217-34.
  62. Elbert T, Ray WJ, Kowalik ZJ et al. Chaos and physiology: deterministic chaos in excitable cell assemblies. Physiol Rev 1994; 74:1-47.
  63. Storella RJ, Kandell RB, Horrow JC et al. Nonlinear measures of heart rate variability after fentanyl-based induction of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:1292-4.
  64. Chamchad D, Arkoosh VA, Horrow JC et al. Using heart rate variability to stratify risk of obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 99:1818-21.

Contains 0 items
Subtotal: $0.00